Navalyze · Other · Ship

KURT PAUL

IMO: 9435856
Type: Other ship types
Ice class: IA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

77.0 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.1 kn

Fuel per day at sea

20.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

585 t

CO₂ emitted

1,836 t

Distance sailed

7,602 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

685 h

29 days, 8% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,142 general cargo ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 66.0 kg/nm · median 55.9 (+18%)

34.9Ranks 718 of 1,142, lowest first96.3

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 10.9 (+21%)

8.2Faster than 91% of general cargo ships13.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 19.39 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 22.70 (−15%)

10.72Ranks 410 of 1,142, lowest first41.63

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU80%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

KURT PAUL
Other median

50.060.070.080.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023

Average speed, kn

KURT PAUL
Other median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

KURT PAUL
Other median

18.020.022.024.026.0

’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2021→2023	−2.1 kn	+17%	−2%	−53%	–	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+5%	−2%	+39%	+6%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.0 kn	+0%	+54%	−32%	−26%	5.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023	not published	585	1,836	7,602	685	11.1	77.0	–	–
2021	not published	1,072	3,383	16,240	1,232	13.2	66.0	–	–
2020	not published	739	2,358	11,711	832	14.1	63.1	–	–
2019	not published	1,092	3,436	17,317	1,895	9.1	63.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	B
2021	not published	19.39	22.70	−15%	410 of 1,142	Korean Register	B
2020	not published	18.24	24.50	−26%	287 of 1,167	Korean Register	B
2019	not published	24.54	24.96	−2%	557 of 1,154	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.