Navalyze · Container · Ship

VERONICA B

IMO: 9436305
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,922 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 29.54 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: JOHANNA SCHEPERS, EXPERT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HS Service GmbH & Co KG · part of HS Schiffahrt

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,199 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.9

Container median 182 kg/nm (−51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

86.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+328%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,047 t

CO₂ emitted

25,080 t

Distance sailed

90,505 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,246 h

260 days, 71% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 163 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.3 (−3%)

9.1Faster than 43% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 59.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+263%)

7.22Ranks 2,109 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

559 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VERONICA B
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VERONICA B
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VERONICA B
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−2%	+3%	−6%	−9%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	−4%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+7%	+0%	+4%	+15%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	+51%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	−19%	+2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	−18%	−25%	−19%	−35%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−5%	−9%	−17%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HS Service GmbH & Co KG	5,160	16,119	69,451	5,397	12.9	74.3	59.2	–
2024	HS Service GmbH & Co KG	5,592	17,450	74,003	6,013	12.3	75.6	64.8	–
2023	not published	5,637	17,570	77,052	6,336	12.2	73.2	60.8	–
2022	not published	5,054	15,760	74,009	5,683	13.0	68.3	52.9	–
2021	not published	3,253	10,233	49,124	3,847	12.8	66.2	56.7	–
2020	not published	4,239	13,488	60,723	4,848	12.5	69.8	55.6	–
2019	not published	6,335	19,789	74,747	5,411	13.8	84.8	85.5	–
2018	not published	8,047	25,080	90,505	6,246	14.5	88.9	86.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	HS Service GmbH & Co KG	59.2	16.3	+263%	2,109 of 2,208	Swiss Climate	B
2024	HS Service GmbH & Co KG	64.8	17.5	+270%	1,883 of 1,974	Swiss Climate	B
2023	not published	60.8	19.4	+214%	1,791 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	52.9	19.1	+177%	1,644 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	56.7	17.9	+217%	1,655 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	55.6	17.6	+216%	1,644 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	85.5	18.9	+353%	1,759 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	86.6	20.2	+328%	1,667 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.