Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ALLEGRA

IMO
9436707
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
19,547 t
Port of registry
Venezia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.51 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,547 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
115.5 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+45%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
18.83
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+25%)
Average speed
11.0 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−1%)
Fuel per day at sea
30.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,574 t
CO₂ emitted
11,389 t
11,564 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
30,943 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,810 h
117 days, 32% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 115.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+45%)
52.8Ranks 1,352 of 1,460, lowest first111.0
Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 11.1 (−1%)
8.8Faster than 47% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.83 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+25%)
7.93Ranks 904 of 1,460, lowest first40.17
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports47%
  • From the EU19%
  • Into the EU19%
  • At berth in the EU16%

81% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,267 t).

Fuel burned laden
3%
97% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
15.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ALLEGRA
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • ALLEGRA
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ALLEGRA
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.9 kn+8%+17%−23%+13%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.7 kn−11%−16%+8%−41%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−1.1 kn+11%+0%+0%+47%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+3.2 kn−1%+36%+26%−20%3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.1 kn+7%+7%−13%+52%Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+2.7 kn−19%+16%+50%−42%2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.5 kn+12%+21%−37%+26%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA3,57411,38930,9432,81011.0115.518.833%
2024part-yearFinav Italy 1 S.r.l.3,65711,45733,9623,37310.1107.715.70–
2024CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA4,33513,58240,3823,97910.1107.416.72–
2023not published4,50514,10837,4273,47210.8120.428.5541%
2022not published4,05012,72837,2993,12611.9108.619.4650%
2021not published3,23810,17429,6213,3948.7109.324.39–
2020not published3,47911,01634,1553,8948.8101.916.06–
2019not published2,8719,00722,7503,7406.1126.227.86–
2018not published4,06012,72236,1216,4075.6112.422.1058%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA18.8315.04+25%904 of 1,460RINAA+B
2024part-yearFinav Italy 1 S.r.l.––––RINA–
2024CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA16.728.06+107%1,467 of 1,787RINAA
2023not published28.558.44+238%1,648 of 1,797ABSB
2022not published19.468.51+129%1,681 of 1,961ABSB
2021not published24.3916.69+46%959 of 1,343DNVB
2020not published16.069.03+78%1,470 of 1,870ABSA
2019not published27.868.83+216%1,767 of 1,919ABSA
2018not published22.108.86+149%1,574 of 1,779ABSA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

ALLEGRA (IMO 9436707): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze