Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ROADRUNNER

IMO: 9438042
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 33,706 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.25 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Oceanbulk Maritime SA

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,706 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

106.6 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.89

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+22%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

581 t

CO₂ emitted

1,816 t

1,844 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,447 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

482 h

20 days, 6% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 106.6 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+26%)

61.8Ranks 2,595 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 10.6 (+7%)

8.8Faster than 76% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.89 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+22%)

4.85Ranks 2,116 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU8%
Into the EU80%
At berth in the EU11%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,021 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ROADRUNNER
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ROADRUNNER
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ROADRUNNER
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	+5%	−8%	−21%	−12%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.3 kn	−25%	−17%	−21%	−30%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.2 kn	+32%	+3%	−31%	+46%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	−10%	+3%	+160%	+19%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	+3%	+19%	−77%	+1%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	+4%	+17%	+8%	−10%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Oceanbulk Maritime SA	652	2,034	5,584	518	10.8	116.8	8.91	–
2024	Oceanbulk Maritime SA	581	1,816	5,447	482	11.3	106.6	9.89	–
2023	not published	704	2,204	6,919	540	12.8	101.8	11.29	–
2022	not published	1,192	3,752	8,733	760	11.5	136.5	16.24	–
2021	not published	1,315	4,106	12,704	863	14.7	103.5	11.09	–
2020	not published	565	1,762	4,895	381	12.8	115.3	9.35	–
2019	not published	2,390	7,478	21,263	1,920	11.1	112.4	9.25	–
2018	not published	2,123	6,635	19,696	1,996	9.9	107.8	10.25	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Oceanbulk Maritime SA	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Oceanbulk Maritime SA	9.89	8.09	+22%	2,116 of 3,089	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	11.29	8.27	+37%	2,636 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	16.24	8.71	+86%	3,528 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	11.09	8.57	+29%	2,561 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	9.35	8.24	+13%	1,978 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	9.25	8.38	+10%	2,013 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	10.25	8.50	+21%	2,315 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.