Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ERIN SCHULTE

IMO
9439814
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
6,303 t
Flag (estimated)
Isle of Man
Port of registry
Douglas
Technical efficiency
EEXI 8.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DORCHESTER LNG(2) LTD

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,707 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
77.9
Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (−5%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
32.0
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+97%)
Average speed
10.5 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−6%)
Fuel per day at sea
19.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,452 t
CO₂ emitted
7,773 t
Distance sailed
31,496 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,987 h
124 days, 34% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−20%)
52.8Ranks 358 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 8.5 kn · median 11.1 (−23%)
8.8Faster than 9% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+116%)
7.93Ranks 1,207 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports25%
  • From the EU25%
  • Into the EU30%
  • At berth in the EU20%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,533 t
19.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ERIN SCHULTE
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • ERIN SCHULTE
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ERIN SCHULTE
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.0 kn−16%−15%+22%−23%Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−2.0 kn−3%−21%−12%+31%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.4 kn+7%+12%+17%−5%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+1.2 kn−7%+5%+23%−24%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−1.3 kn+12%−2%−33%+42%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+5.3 kn−19%+68%+37%−10%5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.9 kn+11%−30%−12%−15%2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025DORCHESTER LNG(2) LTD2,1686,91833,8543,9648.564.032.4–
2024DORCHESTER LNG(2) LTD2,1136,72527,8513,2648.575.941.9–
2023not published2,4527,77331,4962,98710.577.932.0–
2022not published1,9686,24827,0292,67710.172.833.7–
2021not published1,7205,49822,0382,4688.978.044.5–
2020not published2,2967,30033,0253,23910.269.531.3–
2019not published2,0626,53224,0904,9184.985.634.6–
2018not published2,1266,67727,4803,5217.877.440.5–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025DORCHESTER LNG(2) LTD32.415.0+116%1,207 of 1,460DNVB+C
2024DORCHESTER LNG(2) LTD41.916.7+150%1,145 of 1,274DNVA+B+C
2023not published32.016.2+97%1,056 of 1,314DNVA+C
2022not published33.716.1+110%1,182 of 1,409DNVA+C
2021not published44.516.7+167%1,233 of 1,343DNVA+C
2020not published31.316.2+94%1,068 of 1,312DNVA+C
2019not published34.617.3+100%1,107 of 1,321DNVA+C
2018not published40.517.1+136%1,131 of 1,294DNVA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.