Navalyze · Container · Ship

SUNSET X

IMO: 9440590
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,722 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.08 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: SAMSKIP SKALAFELL, PLUTO, VENTO DI PONENTE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Kontor 17 MPM GmbH

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,698 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

68.4

Container median 186 kg/nm (−63%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

58.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+228%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,586 t

CO₂ emitted

11,375 t

Distance sailed

52,426 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,216 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−56%)

78.8Ranks 208 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 13.3 (−26%)

9.1Faster than 15% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+218%)

7.22Ranks 2,045 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU6%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

941 t

8.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SUNSET X
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SUNSET X
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SUNSET X
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−5%	−1%	+147%	−47%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+7%	+6%	−65%	+26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+12%	+5%	+90%	+6%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	+0%	−18%	−66%	+25%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	−5%	+21%	+35%	−16%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.8 kn	+2%	−27%	−46%	−6%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+5.9 kn	−10%	+59%	+58%	+13%	5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	2,242	7,058	28,830	2,913	9.9	77.8	51.9	–
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	955	2,979	11,653	1,233	9.5	82.0	98.1	–
2023	not published	2,577	8,056	33,727	3,519	9.6	76.4	77.6	–
2022	not published	1,216	3,840	17,786	1,744	10.2	68.4	73.5	–
2021	not published	3,586	11,375	52,426	4,216	12.4	68.4	58.7	–
2020	not published	2,785	8,856	38,816	3,945	9.8	71.8	70.2	–
2019	not published	5,076	16,044	71,987	5,296	13.6	70.5	74.7	–
2018	not published	3,585	11,352	45,695	5,935	7.7	78.5	66.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	51.9	16.3	+218%	2,045 of 2,208	DNV	A+C
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	98.1	17.5	+460%	1,954 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	77.6	19.4	+300%	1,874 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	73.5	19.1	+284%	1,776 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	58.7	17.9	+228%	1,671 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	70.2	17.6	+299%	1,747 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	74.7	18.9	+296%	1,733 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	66.1	20.2	+227%	1,610 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.