Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL DAFNA

IMO
9443683
Type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
Mujaro
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.68 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
400.8 kg/nm
LNG carrier median 230.7 kg/nm (+74%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
19.32
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+112%)
Average speed
15.4 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+8%)
Fuel per day at sea
147.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,098 t
CO₂ emitted
16,087 t
Distance sailed
12,720 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
828 h
35 days, 9% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 400.8 kg/nm · median 230.7 (+74%)
166.5Ranks 338 of 355, lowest first358.9
Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 14.2 (+8%)
10.7Faster than 79% of LNG carrier ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 19.32 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+112%)
5.47Ranks 324 of 355, lowest first17.94
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU50%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
50%
50% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
2.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • AL DAFNA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • AL DAFNA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • AL DAFNA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2021→2023+1.9 kn−8%+6%+20%+2%1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−2.9 kn+9%−10%−72%+98%2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+3.2 kn−8%+14%+42%−7%3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published5,09816,08712,72082815.4400.8–50%
2021not published4,59114,47310,59578813.5433.3––
2020not published14,74246,49637,1902,26516.4396.4––
2019not published11,30535,26326,1011,97613.2433.1–100%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2023not published19.329.10+112%324 of 355ABSA+B
2021not published18.9610.46+81%255 of 289ABSC
2020not published9.5610.71−11%103 of 267ABSB+C
2019not published10.2910.87−5%112 of 248ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

AL DAFNA (IMO 9443683): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2023 | Navalyze