Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ARXAGELOS

IMO: 9445124
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 16,436 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.77 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: DESPINA ANGEL, DESPINA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BARU QUALITY SHIPPING CO.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,079 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

77.3

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+51%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,123 t

CO₂ emitted

6,643 t

Distance sailed

27,461 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,154 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 58.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−29%)

61.0Ranks 282 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 10.7 (−7%)

8.8Faster than 26% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+42%)

4.80Ranks 2,820 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU27%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU20%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,347 t

20.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARXAGELOS
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARXAGELOS
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ARXAGELOS
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+1%	−2%	−20%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−4%	−2%	+12%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−16%	−16%	−31%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+17%	+14%	−31%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+2%	−1%	+35%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−21%	−6%	−31%	−12%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	BARU QUALITY SHIPPING CO.	640	2,006	10,885	1,095	9.9	58.8	11.2	–
2025	Royal Maritime Inc	640	2,006	10,885	1,095	9.9	58.8	11.2	–
2024	BARU QUALITY SHIPPING CO.	797	2,494	13,660	1,338	10.2	58.3	–	–
2023	not published	745	2,327	12,214	1,228	9.9	61.0	8.61	–
2022	not published	1,289	4,063	17,683	1,779	9.9	72.9	11.2	–
2021	not published	1,599	5,049	25,622	2,517	10.2	62.4	13.0	–
2020	not published	1,157	3,633	18,916	1,820	10.4	61.2	11.2	–
2019	not published	2,123	6,643	27,461	3,154	8.7	77.3	12.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	BARU QUALITY SHIPPING CO.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2025	Royal Maritime Inc	11.2	7.90	+42%	2,820 of 3,611	EMICERT	A
2024	BARU QUALITY SHIPPING CO.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	8.61	8.27	+4%	1,919 of 3,548	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	11.2	8.71	+28%	2,821 of 3,968	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	13.0	8.57	+52%	2,905 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	11.2	8.24	+36%	2,435 of 3,150	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	12.7	8.38	+51%	2,765 of 3,360	ICS Verification Services	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.