Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

JIN GANG

IMO
9446960
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
23,974 t
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency
EEDI 5.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Goldbeam International Ltd.

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,974 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
243.3 kg/nm
Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+188%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
32.18
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+298%)
Average speed
11.8 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+11%)
Fuel per day at sea
68.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
282 t
CO₂ emitted
893 t
907 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
1,158 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
98 h
4 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 243.3 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+188%)
61.8Ranks 3,083 of 3,089, lowest first119.4
Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 10.6 (+11%)
8.8Faster than 90% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+298%)
4.85Ranks 3,040 of 3,089, lowest first15.76
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU66%
  • At berth in the EU34%

67% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (601 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
34.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearGoldbeam International Ltd.1875951,1011149.6170.0––
2024Goldbeam International Ltd.2828931,1589811.8243.332.18–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearGoldbeam International Ltd.––––VerifaviaC
2024Goldbeam International Ltd.32.188.09+298%3,040 of 3,089VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

JIN GANG (IMO 9446960): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2024–2025 | Navalyze