Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CHAMPION CORNELIA

IMO: 9447744
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 30,665 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NH ERLE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYHILL SHIPPING AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,665 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

92.7 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.49

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−37%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,287 t

CO₂ emitted

7,181 t

7,293 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

24,675 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,145 h

89 days, 24% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 92.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+16%)

52.8Ranks 1,048 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 11.1 (+4%)

8.8Faster than 63% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.49 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−37%)

7.93Ranks 311 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU67%
Into the EU23%
At berth in the EU5%

45% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,263 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CHAMPION CORNELIA
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHAMPION CORNELIA
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHAMPION CORNELIA
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−11%	−7%	−6%	−14%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	−0.8 kn	+6%	−1%	+150%	+22%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+11%	+4%	+44%	+10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.3 kn	−15%	+4%	−73%	−36%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	+6%	+18%	−48%	−19%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.5 kn	+7%	−16%	+246%	+27%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	NYHILL SHIPPING AS	442	1,386	4,784	395	12.1	92.4	8.60	–
2025	Genoa Maritime S.A.	2,287	7,181	24,675	2,145	11.5	92.7	9.49	–
2024	NYHILL SHIPPING AS	2,729	8,526	26,190	2,385	11.0	104.2	11.04	70%
2022	not published	1,028	3,249	10,491	888	11.8	98.0	9.03	–
2021	not published	647	2,024	7,307	580	12.6	88.6	8.21	–
2020	not published	2,783	8,749	26,649	2,584	10.3	104.4	12.91	–
2019	not published	5,068	15,883	51,587	5,549	9.3	98.2	15.87	–
2018	not published	1,372	4,292	14,925	1,265	11.8	91.9	12.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	NYHILL SHIPPING AS	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2025	Genoa Maritime S.A.	9.49	15.04	−37%	311 of 1,460	EMICERT	A
2024	NYHILL SHIPPING AS	11.04	8.06	+37%	1,254 of 1,787	ABS	A
2022	not published	9.03	8.51	+6%	1,063 of 1,961	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	8.21	8.86	−7%	796 of 1,789	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	12.91	9.03	+43%	1,311 of 1,870	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	15.87	8.83	+80%	1,524 of 1,919	DNV	B
2018	not published	12.52	8.86	+41%	1,265 of 1,779	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.