Navalyze · Container · Ship

NORDIC PORTO

IMO: 9448671
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,964 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: BEATRIZ B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,964 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

76.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.65

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+113%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,213 t

CO₂ emitted

13,240 t

13,447 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

54,869 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,955 h

206 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 76.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−57%)

78.8Ranks 192 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 23% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.65 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+113%)

7.22Ranks 1,786 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

97% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,787 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NORDIC PORTO
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDIC PORTO
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC PORTO
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−10%	−15%	−17%	−23%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+11%	+14%	−2%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−12%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+8%	+7%	−3%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−12%	−17%	+10%	−7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−12%	−16%	−13%	−3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	+4%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG	4,213	13,240	54,869	4,955	11.1	76.8	34.65	–
2024	Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG	5,604	17,571	66,001	5,597	11.8	84.9	45.29	–
2023	not published	5,130	16,090	67,326	5,827	11.6	76.2	55.46	–
2022	not published	5,661	17,860	76,607	6,563	11.7	73.9	49.43	–
2021	not published	5,414	17,083	78,765	6,746	11.7	68.7	47.53	–
2020	not published	5,573	17,589	71,718	5,748	12.5	77.7	51.34	–
2019	not published	7,274	22,711	82,470	6,323	13.0	88.2	52.93	–
2018	not published	6,859	21,406	79,634	6,083	13.1	86.1	51.64	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG	34.65	16.30	+113%	1,786 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG	45.29	17.52	+159%	1,692 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	55.46	19.40	+186%	1,743 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	49.43	19.13	+158%	1,601 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	47.53	17.90	+166%	1,567 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	51.34	17.58	+192%	1,610 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	52.93	18.88	+180%	1,582 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	51.64	20.22	+155%	1,506 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.