Navalyze · Container · Ship

NORDIC PORTO

IMO: 9448671
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,964 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: BEATRIZ B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,203 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.2

Container median 174 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

52.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+180%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,274 t

CO₂ emitted

22,711 t

Distance sailed

82,470 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,323 h

263 days, 72% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−57%)

78.8Ranks 192 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 23% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+113%)

7.22Ranks 1,786 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,167 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDIC PORTO
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDIC PORTO
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC PORTO
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−10%	−15%	−17%	−23%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+11%	+14%	−2%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−12%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+8%	+7%	−3%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−12%	−17%	+10%	−7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−12%	−16%	−13%	−3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	+4%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG	4,213	13,240	54,869	4,955	11.1	76.8	34.7	–
2024	Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG	5,604	17,571	66,001	5,597	11.8	84.9	45.3	–
2023	not published	5,130	16,090	67,326	5,827	11.6	76.2	55.5	–
2022	not published	5,661	17,860	76,607	6,563	11.7	73.9	49.4	–
2021	not published	5,414	17,083	78,765	6,746	11.7	68.7	47.5	–
2020	not published	5,573	17,589	71,718	5,748	12.5	77.7	51.3	–
2019	not published	7,274	22,711	82,470	6,323	13.0	88.2	52.9	–
2018	not published	6,859	21,406	79,634	6,083	13.1	86.1	51.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG	34.7	16.3	+113%	1,786 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Nordic Elbe GmbH & Co. KG	45.3	17.5	+159%	1,692 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	55.5	19.4	+186%	1,743 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	49.4	19.1	+158%	1,601 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	47.5	17.9	+166%	1,567 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	51.3	17.6	+192%	1,610 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	52.9	18.9	+180%	1,582 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	51.6	20.2	+155%	1,506 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.