Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO MALAYSIA

IMO
9448774
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
55,977 t
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency
EIV 17.04 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 55,977 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
236.8 kg/nm
Container median 177.5 kg/nm (+33%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.35
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.13 (−30%)
Average speed
14.2 kn
Container median 13.6 kn (+4%)
Fuel per day at sea
80.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,309 t
CO₂ emitted
42,006 t
Distance sailed
56,211 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,964 h
165 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 236.8 kg/nm · median 177.5 (+33%)
77.9Ranks 1,225 of 1,825, lowest first313.7
Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.6 (+4%)
10.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.35 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.13 (−30%)
7.44Ranks 584 of 1,825, lowest first52.60
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports8%
  • From the EU50%
  • Into the EU40%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • COSCO MALAYSIA
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • COSCO MALAYSIA
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • COSCO MALAYSIA
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2021→2022−2.6 kn+3%−13%+161%−7%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2021+2.1 kn−31%−21%+1,131%−15%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2022not published13,30942,00656,2113,96414.2236.813.35–
2021not published4,95415,62421,5481,28016.8229.914.32–
2018not published5861,8261,75112014.7334.516.81–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published13.3519.13−30%584 of 1,825DNVB+C
2021not published14.3217.90−20%666 of 1,781DNVB+C
2018not published16.8120.22−17%667 of 1,705DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

COSCO MALAYSIA (IMO 9448774): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2022 | Navalyze