NOMADIC HJELLESTAD
- IMO
- 9452220
- Type
- Other ship types
- Port of registry
- Majuro
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: New Nomadic Short Sea Shipping AS
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.
Within the general cargo fleet, 2022
Set against all 1,034 general cargo ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports0%
- From the EU49%
- Into the EU50%
- At berth in the EU1%
0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- NOMADIC HJELLESTAD
- Other median
Average speed, kn
- NOMADIC HJELLESTAD
- Other median
CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm
- NOMADIC HJELLESTAD
- Other median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | +0.5 kn | −9% | −3% | −4% | – | 0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | +2.1 kn | −3% | +27% | −3% | – | 2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | −4.3 kn | +10% | −33% | −42% | – | 4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2021→2022 | −0.8 kn | +7% | −1% | +111% | +43% | 0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2020→2021 | +0.3 kn | −3% | +0% | −55% | +25% | Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2019→2020 | +2.6 kn | −29% | −8% | +145% | −69% | 2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | −3.1 kn | +22% | −9% | −65% | +89% | 3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025part-year | New Nomadic Short Sea Shipping AS | 998 | 3,138 | 17,864 | 1,932 | 9.2 | 55.9 | – | – |
| 2025 | MPP Venture AS | 998 | 3,138 | 17,864 | 1,932 | 9.2 | 55.9 | – | – |
| 2024 | New Nomadic Short Sea Shipping AS | 1,148 | 3,601 | 18,603 | 2,147 | 8.7 | 61.7 | – | – |
| 2023 | not published | 1,218 | 3,832 | 19,152 | 2,890 | 6.6 | 63.6 | – | – |
| 2022 | not published | 1,894 | 5,956 | 32,843 | 3,011 | 10.9 | 57.7 | – | – |
| 2021 | not published | 843 | 2,633 | 15,585 | 1,328 | 11.7 | 54.1 | – | – |
| 2020 | not published | 1,939 | 6,087 | 34,703 | 3,056 | 11.4 | 55.9 | – | – |
| 2019 | not published | 1,107 | 3,457 | 14,148 | 1,599 | 8.8 | 78.2 | – | – |
| 2018 | not published | 2,588 | 8,100 | 40,460 | 3,387 | 11.9 | 64.0 | – | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Other median | vs Other | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025part-year | New Nomadic Short Sea Shipping AS | – | – | – | – | DNV | A |
| 2025 | MPP Venture AS | – | – | – | – | DNV | A |
| 2024 | New Nomadic Short Sea Shipping AS | – | – | – | – | DNV | A |
| 2023 | not published | – | – | – | – | DNV | A |
| 2022 | not published | 49.61 | 21.57 | +130% | 957 of 1,034 | DNV | A |
| 2021 | not published | 34.65 | 22.70 | +53% | 951 of 1,142 | DNV | A |
| 2020 | not published | 27.64 | 24.50 | +13% | 720 of 1,167 | DNV | A |
| 2019 | not published | 90.39 | 24.96 | +262% | 1,110 of 1,154 | DNV | A |
| 2018 | not published | 47.86 | 24.89 | +92% | 895 of 1,044 | DNV | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.