Navalyze · Other · Ship

BBC ALASKA

IMO: 9453793
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 285 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Ice class: IA
Former names: COE LENI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Briese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum · part of Briese

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 285 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

53.7 kg/nm

Other median 87.2 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

595

g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 86.69 (+586%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Other median 10.4 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,913 t

CO₂ emitted

6,029 t

6,123 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

35,611 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,039 h

127 days, 35% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2025

Set against all 159 other ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 53.7 kg/nm · median 87.2 (−38%)

47.6Ranks 29 of 159, lowest first160.7

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 10.4 (+13%)

5.8Faster than 70% of other ships13.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 594.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 86.69 (+586%)

30.78Ranks 143 of 159, lowest first600.46

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU49%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU4%

26% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,552 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BBC ALASKA
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BBC ALASKA
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

BBC ALASKA
General cargo median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	−16%	−22%	+18%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+5%	+1%	+48%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.6 kn	+2%	+41%	+10%	–	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.3 kn	+7%	−20%	−58%	–	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+4%	+1%	+76%	−36%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	−12%	−1%	−23%	+38%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+12%	+17%	−1%	−21%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Briese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum	1,090	3,433	19,797	1,765	11.2	55.1	–	–
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	1,913	6,029	35,611	3,039	11.7	53.7	594.70	–
2024	Briese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum	1,948	6,098	30,277	2,424	12.5	64.3	–	–
2023	not published	1,254	3,912	20,413	1,565	13.0	61.4	24.42	–
2022	not published	1,108	3,480	18,479	1,957	9.4	60.0	–	–
2021	not published	2,459	7,804	43,942	3,472	12.7	56.0	–	–
2020	not published	1,344	4,281	24,977	1,918	13.0	53.8	–	–
2019	not published	1,988	6,221	32,621	2,819	11.6	60.9	–	–
2018	not published	1,789	5,603	33,003	2,963	11.1	54.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Briese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	B
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	594.70	86.69	+586%	143 of 159	DNV	A+C
2024	Briese Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Brinkum	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	B
2023	not published	24.42	93.54	−74%	12 of 116	Korean Register	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	B
2021	not published	19.01	22.70	−16%	395 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	29.57	24.50	+21%	791 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	21.41	24.96	−14%	405 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	27.02	24.89	+9%	591 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.