Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM LAPEROUSE

IMO
9454412
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
144,906 t
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EIV 9.85 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 144,906 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
251.2 kg/nm
Container median 172.2 kg/nm (+46%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
5.43
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.58 (−69%)
Average speed
16.0 kn
Container median 14.0 kn (+14%)
Fuel per day at sea
96.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,054 t
CO₂ emitted
12,701 t
Distance sailed
16,142 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,010 h
42 days, 12% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,797 container ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 251.2 kg/nm · median 172.2 (+46%)
80.4Ranks 1,285 of 1,797, lowest first314.7
Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 14.0 (+14%)
10.4Faster than 82% of container ships16.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.43 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.58 (−69%)
7.14Ranks 16 of 1,797, lowest first52.30
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports14%
  • From the EU67%
  • Into the EU19%
  • At berth in the EU0%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CMA CGM LAPEROUSE
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • CMA CGM LAPEROUSE
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CMA CGM LAPEROUSE
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020−0.3 kn−24%−26%−72%−27%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.9 kn+6%+1%−13%−5%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published4,05412,70116,1421,01016.0251.25.43–
2019not published19,43960,72358,6143,60616.3331.67.4697%
2018not published21,08365,83467,6013,93317.2311.97.83–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published5.4317.58−69%16 of 1,797ABSC
2019not published7.4618.88−60%156 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published7.8320.22−61%123 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

CMA CGM LAPEROUSE (IMO 9454412): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2020 | Navalyze