Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HABIP BAYRAK

IMO: 9458183
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,823 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 16.09 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Acechem Tanker BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,823 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

51.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.89

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+185%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,492 t

CO₂ emitted

4,784 t

4,857 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

29,175 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,738 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 51.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−36%)

52.8Ranks 124 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.1 (−4%)

8.8Faster than 37% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.89 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+185%)

7.93Ranks 1,336 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU4%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU11%

94% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,515 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HABIP BAYRAK
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HABIP BAYRAK
Chemical tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HABIP BAYRAK
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−6%	+3%	−22%	+29%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+1%	−9%	+11%	−28%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	−18%	+22%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+17%	+19%	−7%	+2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+2%	−1%	−11%	+6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−8%	+17%	−5%	−2%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	+3%	+14%	+20%	−22%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Acechem Tanker BV	1,492	4,784	29,175	2,738	10.7	51.1	42.89	–
2024	ACECHEM TANKER DENIZCILIK TURIZM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI	2,035	6,524	37,456	3,836	9.8	54.3	33.28	–
2023	not published	1,830	5,867	33,857	3,131	10.8	54.0	46.00	–
2022	not published	2,248	7,207	41,382	3,763	11.0	54.3	37.61	–
2021	not published	2,071	6,639	44,424	4,135	10.7	46.6	36.97	–
2020	not published	2,303	7,383	50,127	4,557	11.0	45.9	34.89	–
2019	not published	2,634	8,274	52,681	6,151	8.6	50.0	35.56	–
2018	not published	2,132	6,734	43,810	5,689	7.7	48.6	45.43	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Acechem Tanker BV	42.89	15.04	+185%	1,336 of 1,460	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	ACECHEM TANKER DENIZCILIK TURIZM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI	33.28	16.73	+99%	1,034 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	46.00	16.23	+183%	1,204 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	37.61	16.06	+134%	1,231 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	36.97	16.69	+122%	1,158 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	34.89	16.16	+116%	1,113 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	35.56	17.32	+105%	1,115 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	45.43	17.14	+165%	1,172 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.