Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

GOLDEN AMBER

IMO: 9458987
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 42,408 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.64 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GOLDEN AMBER LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,408 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

102.4 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.59

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−4%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,955 t

CO₂ emitted

9,288 t

9,434 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

28,857 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,663 h

111 days, 30% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 102.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+24%)

61.0Ranks 2,993 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 57% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.59 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−4%)

4.80Ranks 1,661 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU36%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU2%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,686 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GOLDEN AMBER
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOLDEN AMBER
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GOLDEN AMBER
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+2%	+3%	−3%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	−4%	+9%	+11%	−18%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−8%	−15%	−41%	−1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−2%	−6%	+68%	+27%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+16%	+13%	+76%	+46%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.3 kn	−12%	+25%	−56%	−34%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+4%	−2%	−35%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	GOLDEN AMBER LTD.	2,955	9,288	28,857	2,663	10.8	102.4	7.59	–
2024	GOLDEN AMBER LTD.	2,982	9,344	29,763	2,761	10.8	100.2	9.77	–
2023	not published	2,808	8,773	26,767	2,832	9.5	104.9	11.88	–
2022	not published	5,184	16,264	45,677	4,436	10.3	113.5	11.97	–
2021	not published	3,138	9,867	27,119	2,527	10.7	115.7	9.39	–
2020	not published	1,531	4,827	15,375	1,399	11.0	99.6	6.43	–
2019	not published	3,979	12,521	35,152	4,550	7.7	113.2	9.80	–
2018	not published	5,879	18,554	54,117	6,580	8.2	108.6	10.04	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GOLDEN AMBER LTD.	7.59	7.89	−4%	1,661 of 3,610	DNV	B+C
2024	GOLDEN AMBER LTD.	9.77	8.09	+21%	2,076 of 3,089	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	11.88	8.27	+44%	2,746 of 3,548	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	11.97	8.71	+37%	3,000 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	9.39	8.57	+10%	2,059 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.43	8.24	−22%	794 of 3,150	DNV	C
2019	not published	9.80	8.38	+17%	2,187 of 3,360	DNV	C
2018	not published	10.04	8.50	+18%	2,237 of 3,384	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.