Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

NCC SHAMS

IMO: 9459010
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 23,802 t
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,816 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

135

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+3%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

593 t

CO₂ emitted

1,856 t

Distance sailed

4,400 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

464 h

19 days, 5% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 101 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+26%)

52.8Ranks 1,180 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 11.1 (+8%)

8.8Faster than 81% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−12%)

7.93Ranks 602 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU23%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU16%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

300 t

16.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NCC SHAMS
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

NCC SHAMS
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NCC SHAMS
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−1.3 kn	−20%	−28%	+25%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+1%	−4%	+124%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.3 kn	+5%	+26%	−79%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+5%	+8%	+107%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	−0%	+24%	+69%	−20%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−17%	−19%	+68%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,546	4,839	15,366	1,278	12.0	101	13.2	69%
2023	not published	1,553	4,864	12,313	925	13.3	126	–	60%
2022	not published	685	2,141	5,501	394	14.0	125	–	–
2021	not published	3,061	9,575	25,853	2,208	11.7	118	9.55	92%
2020	not published	1,405	4,393	12,509	1,091	11.5	112	12.6	–
2019	not published	833	2,600	7,406	801	9.3	113	15.8	–
2018	not published	593	1,856	4,400	464	9.5	135	17.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	13.2	15.0	−12%	602 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2021	not published	9.55	16.7	−43%	134 of 1,343	ABS	C
2020	not published	12.6	16.2	−22%	386 of 1,312	ABS	C
2019	not published	15.8	17.3	−9%	560 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	17.7	17.1	+3%	677 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.