Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

NCC NAJEM

IMO: 9459022
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 21,601 t
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,712 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

107

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (−33%)

Average speed

5.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−45%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

709 t

CO₂ emitted

2,214 t

Distance sailed

6,635 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,186 h

49 days, 14% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 103 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+29%)

52.8Ranks 1,223 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 11.1 (+12%)

8.8Faster than 90% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−1%)

7.93Ranks 724 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU13%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

263 t

11.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NCC NAJEM
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

NCC NAJEM
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NCC NAJEM
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−0.6 kn	−1%	−5%	+0%	+35%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−22%	−6%	+73%	−20%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+20%	+15%	−75%	+23%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+5.7 kn	+4%	+110%	+549%	−4%	5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,929	6,060	18,767	1,512	12.4	103	15.0	58%
2023	not published	1,939	6,076	18,697	1,440	13.0	104	11.1	68%
2022	not published	1,437	4,514	10,825	1,000	10.8	133	13.8	78%
2021	not published	4,784	14,951	43,081	3,821	11.3	111	11.2	82%
2019	not published	709	2,214	6,635	1,186	5.6	107	11.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	15.0	15.0	−1%	724 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	11.1	16.2	−32%	294 of 1,314	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.8	16.1	−14%	537 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	11.2	16.7	−33%	279 of 1,343	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.6	17.3	−33%	291 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.