Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK NACALA

IMO
9459424
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
31,633 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEXI 14.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
HANSA AMERICA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wilhelmsen Ahrenkiel Bulk GmbH & Co. KG · part of Wilhelmsen Ahrenkiel

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 31,633 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
155.8 kg/nm
Container median 167.2 kg/nm (−7%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
15.34
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (−12%)
Average speed
14.9 kn
Container median 13.5 kn (+10%)
Fuel per day at sea
55.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,185 t
CO₂ emitted
9,921 t
10,077 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
20,444 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,368 h
57 days, 16% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 155.8 kg/nm · median 167.2 (−7%)
78.9Ranks 904 of 1,974, lowest first301.6
Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.5 (+10%)
9.6Faster than 74% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (−12%)
7.33Ranks 843 of 1,974, lowest first51.62
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU15%
  • Into the EU85%
  • At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,968 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MAERSK NACALA
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MAERSK NACALA
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MAERSK NACALA
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2024+1.0 kn+9%+17%−29%+23%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.1 kn+5%−3%−5%−4%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.6 kn−22%−25%+10%−19%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.3 kn−8%−9%+90%−3%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearWilhelmsen Ahrenkiel Bulk GmbH & Co. KG00–0––––
2024Zeaborn Ship Management GmbH & Cie. KG3,1859,92120,4441,36814.9155.815.34–
2023not published4,13513,03028,9012,08613.9143.112.48–
2022not published4,17013,14430,5062,03015.0136.712.99–
2021not published4,87815,19327,6961,77015.6176.116.07–
2020not published2,7858,67414,56191515.9191.316.56–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearWilhelmsen Ahrenkiel Bulk GmbH & Co. KG––––DNVA
2024Zeaborn Ship Management GmbH & Cie. KG15.3417.52−12%843 of 1,974DNVA
2023not published12.4819.40−36%568 of 1,899DNVA+B
2022not published12.9919.13−32%551 of 1,825DNVB
2021not published16.0717.90−10%784 of 1,781VerifaviaB
2020not published16.5617.58−6%825 of 1,797DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

MAERSK NACALA (IMO 9459424): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2020–2025 | Navalyze