Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WADI SAFAGA

IMO: 9460734
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 47,025 t
Port of registry: Alexandria
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.62 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: National Navigation Co

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 47,025 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

106.4 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.19

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−9%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,333 t

CO₂ emitted

4,233 t

4,299 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

12,520 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,118 h

47 days, 13% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 106.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+29%)

61.0Ranks 3,112 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.7 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 73% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.19 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−9%)

4.80Ranks 1,480 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU15%
Into the EU80%
At berth in the EU1%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,219 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

WADI SAFAGA
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WADI SAFAGA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WADI SAFAGA
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−25%	−20%	+169%	−51%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+28%	+40%	−78%	+64%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−4%	−2%	−0%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+3.4 kn	−25%	+18%	+292%	−14%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.2 kn	−11%	−35%	+208%	−25%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.5 kn	+6%	−9%	−85%	+16%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.3 kn	−17%	+26%	+65%	−55%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	National Navigation Co	1,333	4,233	12,520	1,118	11.2	106.4	7.19	–
2024	National Navigation Co	659	2,081	4,652	445	10.5	141.7	14.74	–
2023	not published	2,370	7,482	21,469	2,227	9.6	110.4	9.00	–
2022	not published	2,471	7,809	21,476	2,277	9.4	115.0	11.76	59%
2021	not published	842	2,631	5,479	920	6.0	153.6	13.71	52%
2020	not published	307	969	1,780	216	8.2	172.6	18.38	54%
2019	not published	1,907	5,956	11,752	1,217	9.7	162.2	15.87	46%
2018	not published	1,382	4,310	7,107	1,110	6.4	194.5	35.47	26%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	National Navigation Co	7.19	7.89	−9%	1,480 of 3,610	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	National Navigation Co	14.74	8.09	+82%	2,734 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	9.00	8.27	+9%	2,051 of 3,548	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	11.76	8.71	+35%	2,956 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	13.71	8.57	+60%	2,984 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	18.38	8.24	+123%	2,977 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	15.87	8.38	+89%	3,054 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	35.47	8.50	+317%	3,326 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.