Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WADI SAFAGA

IMO: 9460734
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 47,025 t
Flag (estimated): Egypt
Port of registry: Alexandria
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.62 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: National Navigation Co

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,098 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

195

Bulk carrier median 92.4 kg/nm (+110%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

35.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.50 (+317%)

Average speed

6.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.4 kn (−38%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,382 t

CO₂ emitted

4,310 t

Distance sailed

7,107 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,110 h

46 days, 13% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 106 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+29%)

61.0Ranks 3,113 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.7 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 73% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.19 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−9%)

4.80Ranks 1,481 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU26%
Into the EU70%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

363 t

26% of all fuel; 74% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

163 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WADI SAFAGA
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WADI SAFAGA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WADI SAFAGA
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−25%	−20%	+169%	−51%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+28%	+40%	−78%	+64%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−4%	−2%	−0%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+3.4 kn	−25%	+18%	+292%	−14%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.2 kn	−11%	−35%	+208%	−25%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.5 kn	+6%	−9%	−85%	+16%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.3 kn	−17%	+26%	+65%	−55%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	National Navigation Co	1,333	4,233	12,520	1,118	11.2	106	7.19	–
2024	National Navigation Co	659	2,081	4,652	445	10.5	142	14.7	–
2023	not published	2,370	7,482	21,469	2,227	9.6	110	9.00	–
2022	not published	2,471	7,809	21,476	2,277	9.4	115	11.8	59%
2021	not published	842	2,631	5,479	920	6.0	154	13.7	52%
2020	not published	307	969	1,780	216	8.2	173	18.4	54%
2019	not published	1,907	5,956	11,752	1,217	9.7	162	15.9	46%
2018	not published	1,382	4,310	7,107	1,110	6.4	195	35.5	26%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	National Navigation Co	7.19	7.90	−9%	1,481 of 3,611	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	National Navigation Co	14.7	8.09	+82%	2,734 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	9.00	8.27	+9%	2,051 of 3,548	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	11.8	8.71	+35%	2,956 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	13.7	8.57	+60%	2,984 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	18.4	8.24	+123%	2,977 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	15.9	8.38	+89%	3,054 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	35.5	8.50	+317%	3,326 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.