Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WADI TIBA

IMO: 9460746
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 34,313 t
Flag (estimated): Egypt
Port of registry: Alexandria
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.62 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: National Navigation Co

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,187 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

164

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (+80%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+74%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

841 t

CO₂ emitted

2,630 t

Distance sailed

5,130 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

450 h

19 days, 5% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 143 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+73%)

61.0Ranks 3,445 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 10.7 (−7%)

8.8Faster than 27% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+67%)

4.80Ranks 3,069 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU14%

Fuel burned laden

399 t

48% of all fuel; 53% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

360 t

13.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WADI TIBA
Bulk carrier median

0.0200.0400.0600.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WADI TIBA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WADI TIBA
Bulk carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−21%	−24%	+54%	−27%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.8 kn	−68%	−56%	+189%	−68%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 68%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	+342%	+388%	−89%	+259%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 342%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−3.4 kn	−11%	−41%	+8%	−32%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+2%	+14%	+85%	+84%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.2 kn	−13%	−30%	+73%	−14%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.7 kn	+8%	+42%	+71%	−36%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	National Navigation Co	1,276	4,036	8,903	894	10.0	143	13.2	–
2024	National Navigation Co	1,051	3,283	5,778	560	10.3	182	18.0	–
2023	not published	1,150	3,628	2,001	268	7.5	575	56.7	–
2022	not published	2,311	7,294	17,779	2,630	6.8	130	15.8	–
2021	not published	2,401	7,511	16,389	1,603	10.2	147	23.1	14%
2020	not published	1,271	4,012	8,872	966	9.2	143	12.6	57%
2019	not published	841	2,630	5,130	450	11.4	164	14.6	48%
2018	not published	453	1,413	2,992	342	8.7	151	22.9	33%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	National Navigation Co	13.2	7.90	+67%	3,069 of 3,611	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	National Navigation Co	18.0	8.09	+123%	2,870 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	56.7	8.27	+585%	3,527 of 3,548	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	15.8	8.71	+81%	3,496 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	23.1	8.57	+170%	3,362 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	12.6	8.24	+52%	2,643 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	14.6	8.38	+74%	2,960 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	22.9	8.50	+169%	3,238 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.