Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WADI ALYARMOUK

IMO: 9460772
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 48,879 t
Flag (estimated): Egypt
Port of registry: Alexandria
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: National Navigation Co

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,787 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

166

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (+92%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+148%)

Average speed

6.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−39%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

377 t

CO₂ emitted

1,194 t

Distance sailed

2,270 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

333 h

14 days, 4% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 131 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+58%)

61.0Ranks 3,373 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 10.7 (+7%)

8.8Faster than 84% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+8%)

4.80Ranks 2,087 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU38%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

143 t

38% of all fuel; 62% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

158 t

13.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WADI ALYARMOUK
Bulk carrier median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WADI ALYARMOUK
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WADI ALYARMOUK
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.9 kn	+10%	+31%	+338%	−26%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−15%	−10%	−79%	−1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+5%	+9%	+81%	−6%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	−7%	−20%	+112%	−18%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.4 kn	−13%	+29%	+195%	−27%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.9 kn	+24%	−21%	−66%	+47%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	−12%	+5%	−40%	−6%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	National Navigation Co	3,073	9,760	23,491	2,037	11.5	131	8.50	18%
2024	National Navigation Co	641	2,021	5,367	558	9.6	119	11.4	–
2023	not published	3,620	11,447	25,810	2,838	9.1	140	11.6	–
2022	not published	1,908	6,023	14,232	1,633	8.7	134	12.3	55%
2021	not published	965	3,017	6,705	659	10.2	144	15.0	19%
2020	not published	377	1,194	2,270	333	6.8	166	20.4	38%
2019	not published	895	2,802	6,676	626	10.7	134	13.9	47%
2018	not published	1,682	5,244	11,097	1,231	9.0	152	14.8	46%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	National Navigation Co	8.50	7.90	+8%	2,087 of 3,611	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	National Navigation Co	11.4	8.09	+41%	2,428 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	11.6	8.27	+40%	2,693 of 3,548	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	12.3	8.71	+41%	3,055 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	15.0	8.57	+75%	3,095 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	20.4	8.24	+148%	3,027 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	13.9	8.38	+65%	2,900 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	14.8	8.50	+74%	2,978 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.