Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MRC MINA

IMO: 9464285
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 4,333 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: M.R.C. Denizcilik Turizm Ve Petrol Urunleri Tic. Ltd. Sti.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,333 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

50.8 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

37.34

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+148%)

Average speed

6.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−38%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,178 t

CO₂ emitted

6,937 t

7,044 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

42,877 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,213 h

259 days, 71% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 50.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−36%)

52.8Ranks 121 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 6.9 kn · median 11.1 (−38%)

8.8Faster than 4% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 37.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+148%)

7.93Ranks 1,273 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports58%
From the EU21%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU6%

82% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,693 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MRC MINA
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MRC MINA
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MRC MINA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−4.5 kn	−6%	−43%	+11%	−3%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+8%	+6%	+85%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	−18%	−9%	−4%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	−47%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+6%	−3%	−20%	+4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	−1%	+30%	−4%	−16%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+1%	+0%	−2%	+24%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	M.R.C. Denizcilik Turizm Ve Petrol Urunleri Tic. Ltd. Sti.	2,178	6,937	42,877	6,213	6.9	50.8	37.34	–
2024	M.R.C. Denizcilik Turizm Ve Petrol Urunleri Tic. Ltd. Sti.	2,092	6,574	38,746	3,401	11.4	54.0	38.38	73%
2023	not published	1,040	3,284	20,896	1,800	11.6	49.8	100.39	51%
2022	not published	1,325	4,187	21,854	2,092	10.4	60.6	40.99	–
2021	not published	2,519	7,894	41,194	3,951	10.4	61.1	39.22	–
2020	not published	2,954	9,256	51,266	4,520	11.3	57.6	37.72	–
2019	not published	3,117	9,791	53,653	6,173	8.7	58.1	45.16	–
2018	not published	3,151	9,890	54,508	6,250	8.7	57.8	36.54	85%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	M.R.C. Denizcilik Turizm Ve Petrol Urunleri Tic. Ltd. Sti.	37.34	15.04	+148%	1,273 of 1,460	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	M.R.C. Denizcilik Turizm Ve Petrol Urunleri Tic. Ltd. Sti.	38.38	16.73	+129%	1,105 of 1,274	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2022	not published	40.99	16.06	+155%	1,274 of 1,409	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	39.22	16.69	+135%	1,190 of 1,343	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	37.72	16.16	+133%	1,151 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	45.16	17.32	+161%	1,207 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	36.54	17.14	+113%	1,090 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.