Navalyze · Other · Ship

KLARA

IMO: 9467160
Type: Other ship types
Port of registry: Funchal, Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PACIFIC WINTER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG ACM MS “KLARA” · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

93.9 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

13.3 kn

Fuel per day at sea

29.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

564 t

CO₂ emitted

1,683 t

1,711 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,007 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

453 h

19 days, 5% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 92.2 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+27%)

42.2Ranks 135 of 189, lowest first142.3

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 11.1 (+23%)

8.5Faster than 87% of other ships14.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 87.60 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.55 (+70%)

21.30Ranks 120 of 189, lowest first306.29

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU69%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU5%

31% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (524 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.017

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

KLARA
Other median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KLARA
Other median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

KLARA
Other median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+2%	−1%	−61%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+10%	+3%	+60%	−18%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−4%	+1%	−67%	+249%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−14%	−11%	−49%	−6%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.9 kn	+8%	+36%	+32%	−2%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.4 kn	−0%	−19%	+44%	+25%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+9%	+2%	+37%	+7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG ACM MS “KLARA”	564	1,683	6,007	453	13.3	93.9	–	–
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG ACM MS “KLARA”	1,421	4,488	15,410	1,125	13.7	92.2	87.60	–
2023	not published	806	2,542	9,613	658	14.6	83.8	106.26	–
2022	not published	2,563	8,096	29,227	2,120	13.8	87.7	129.63	–
2021	not published	5,767	18,230	56,827	4,247	13.4	101.5	–	–
2020	not published	4,066	12,886	43,060	4,088	10.5	94.4	–	–
2019	not published	2,823	8,858	29,822	2,304	12.9	94.7	83.83	–
2018	not published	1,893	5,934	21,784	1,576	13.8	86.9	103.60	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG ACM MS “KLARA”	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG ACM MS “KLARA”	87.60	51.55	+70%	120 of 189	Swiss Climate	A
2023	not published	106.26	93.54	+14%	65 of 116	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	30.49	21.57	+41%	774 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	32.53	22.70	+43%	917 of 1,142	RINA	A
2020	not published	33.32	24.50	+36%	878 of 1,167	RINA	A
2019	not published	26.75	24.96	+7%	643 of 1,154	RINA	A
2018	not published	25.10	24.89	+1%	530 of 1,044	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.