Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ALASKA

IMO: 9469572
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 103,038 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.21 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 103,038 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

329.4 kg/nm

Container median 174.4 kg/nm (+89%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.96

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.88 (−47%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

121.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,648 t

CO₂ emitted

23,830 t

Distance sailed

23,220 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,506 h

63 days, 17% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 329.4 kg/nm · median 174.4 (+89%)

82.1Ranks 1,709 of 1,788, lowest first308.8

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.7 (+12%)

8.6Faster than 74% of container ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.96 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.88 (−47%)

7.86Ranks 316 of 1,788, lowest first55.28

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU18%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM ALASKA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ALASKA
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ALASKA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+2%	−5%	−65%	+1%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2019	not published	7,648	23,830	23,220	1,506	15.4	329.4	9.96	–
2018	not published	21,559	67,147	66,714	4,052	16.5	323.1	9.82	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	9.96	18.88	−47%	316 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	9.82	20.22	−51%	254 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.