Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PRAETORIUS

IMO: 9470856
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 17,187 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fortius Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,187 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

57.4 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−31%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.59

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+34%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,924 t

CO₂ emitted

6,106 t

6,200 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

33,545 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,753 h

115 days, 31% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 57.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−31%)

61.0Ranks 242 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 10.7 (+14%)

8.8Faster than 96% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.59 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+34%)

4.80Ranks 2,700 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU42%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU9%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,580 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PRAETORIUS
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRAETORIUS
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRAETORIUS
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	+12%	+38%	+183%	+44%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	−29%	−33%	−53%	−39%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−11%	−11%	−17%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+18%	+6%	+4%	+17%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+1%	+6%	+138%	+42%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.1 kn	−7%	+28%	−56%	−42%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.5 kn	+3%	−28%	+55%	+13%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Fortius Ship Management Ltd	1,924	6,106	33,545	2,753	12.2	57.4	10.59	–
2024	Fortius Ship Management Ltd	606	1,908	11,845	1,195	9.9	51.2	7.33	–
2023	not published	1,808	5,680	25,175	2,396	10.5	71.8	12.11	–
2022	not published	2,443	7,699	30,256	2,889	10.5	80.7	12.79	–
2021	not published	1,994	6,293	29,131	2,496	11.7	68.5	10.90	–
2020	not published	831	2,638	12,236	1,105	11.1	67.9	7.69	–
2019	not published	2,023	6,333	27,561	3,447	8.0	73.4	13.37	–
2018	not published	1,259	3,943	17,742	1,538	11.5	71.0	11.83	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Fortius Ship Management Ltd	10.59	7.89	+34%	2,700 of 3,610	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	Fortius Ship Management Ltd	7.33	8.09	−9%	1,220 of 3,089	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	12.11	8.27	+46%	2,789 of 3,548	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	12.79	8.71	+47%	3,143 of 3,968	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	10.90	8.57	+27%	2,520 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	7.69	8.24	−7%	1,339 of 3,150	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	13.37	8.38	+60%	2,846 of 3,360	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	11.83	8.50	+39%	2,643 of 3,384	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.