Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MADRID

IMO: 9480198
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 40,119 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.12 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Kommanditgesellschaft MS "CPO BILBAO" Offen Reederei GmbH & Co. · part of Offen Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 36,849 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

221

Container median 174 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−1%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

85.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,177 t

CO₂ emitted

47,282 t

Distance sailed

68,726 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,269 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 222 kg/nm · median 177 (+25%)

78.8Ranks 1,413 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 74% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+6%)

7.22Ranks 1,179 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU28%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,262 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MADRID
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MADRID
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MADRID
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+8%	+14%	+24%	+10%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+11%	+9%	−20%	−1%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	−21%	−34%	−13%	−4%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+2%	+9%	+9%	+19%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+4%	+2%	−16%	−18%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−0%	+2%	+25%	−10%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−2%	+2%	+13%	+14%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Kommanditgesellschaft MS "CPO BILBAO" Offen Reederei GmbH & Co.	15,183	47,591	68,450	4,619	14.8	222	17.3	–
2024	Kommanditgesellschaft MS "CPO BILBAO" Offen Reederei GmbH & Co.	11,308	35,248	55,218	3,906	14.1	205	15.8	–
2023	not published	12,719	39,623	68,862	4,771	14.4	185	15.9	–
2022	not published	18,427	57,387	79,108	4,560	17.3	233	16.5	–
2021	not published	16,637	51,830	72,551	4,476	16.2	229	13.9	–
2020	not published	18,957	59,042	86,224	5,225	16.5	220	16.9	–
2019	not published	15,177	47,282	68,726	4,269	16.1	221	18.7	–
2018	not published	13,740	42,807	61,012	3,941	15.5	225	16.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Kommanditgesellschaft MS "CPO BILBAO" Offen Reederei GmbH & Co.	17.3	16.3	+6%	1,179 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Kommanditgesellschaft MS "CPO BILBAO" Offen Reederei GmbH & Co.	15.8	17.5	−10%	867 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	15.9	19.4	−18%	779 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	16.5	19.1	−14%	790 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.9	17.9	−23%	618 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	16.9	17.6	−4%	848 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	18.7	18.9	−1%	881 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	16.4	20.2	−19%	638 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.