Navalyze · Container · Ship

ELBWIND

IMO: 9483334
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,652 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.51 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: LINDAUNIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS Allegro GmbH Co. KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,554 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

96.2

Container median 172 kg/nm (−44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+161%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,366 t

CO₂ emitted

19,942 t

Distance sailed

66,200 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,538 h

231 days, 63% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 294 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 38.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+139%)

7.22Ranks 1,859 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports58%
From the EU16%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

716 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELBWIND
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELBWIND
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELBWIND
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+6%	+4%	−12%	+10%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−3%	−6%	+5%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+3%	+9%	+7%	−5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−6%	−9%	−12%	+8%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−14%	−14%	−9%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+5%	+17%	+14%	+15%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+3%	+5%	+0%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS Allegro GmbH Co. KG	4,324	13,469	52,040	4,493	11.6	83.1	38.9	–
2024	MS Allegro GmbH Co. KG	4,620	14,493	59,037	4,974	11.9	78.2	35.3	–
2023	not published	4,558	14,398	56,316	4,641	12.1	80.9	32.8	–
2022	not published	4,129	12,908	52,818	4,595	11.5	78.2	34.7	–
2021	not published	4,993	15,635	60,187	5,058	11.9	83.0	32.1	–
2020	not published	6,366	19,942	66,200	5,538	12.0	96.2	46.0	–
2019	not published	5,280	16,568	57,904	5,387	10.7	91.2	40.1	–
2018	not published	5,104	16,095	57,874	5,458	10.6	88.2	38.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS Allegro GmbH Co. KG	38.9	16.3	+139%	1,859 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	MS Allegro GmbH Co. KG	35.3	17.5	+101%	1,552 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	32.8	19.4	+69%	1,401 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	34.7	19.1	+81%	1,396 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	32.1	17.9	+80%	1,348 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	46.0	17.6	+161%	1,560 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	40.1	18.9	+112%	1,423 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	38.0	20.2	+88%	1,308 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.