Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

FARHAH

IMO: 9484742
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 167,847 t
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 269,558 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

298

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+116%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

3.46

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−61%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

68.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,651 t

CO₂ emitted

17,678 t

Distance sailed

18,954 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,969 h

82 days, 22% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 214 kg/nm · median 129 (+66%)

76.1Ranks 1,568 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 10.7 (+7%)

8.0Faster than 73% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 3.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−50%)

4.51Ranks 88 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU75%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,002 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FARHAH
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’252025

Average speed, kn

FARHAH
Oil tanker median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’192019’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FARHAH
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’192019’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2019→2025	+1.8 kn	−28%	−15%	−11%	+15%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	3,594	11,232	16,813	1,469	11.4	214	3.98	69%
2019	not published	5,651	17,678	18,954	1,969	9.6	298	3.46	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	3.98	7.95	−50%	88 of 1,665	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	3.46	8.83	−61%	104 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.