Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SPAR CAPELLA

IMO: 9490844
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 33,432 t
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.11 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spar Shipping A/S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,432 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

93.8 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.81

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+12%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,813 t

CO₂ emitted

5,695 t

5,784 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,336 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,863 h

78 days, 21% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 93.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+14%)

61.0Ranks 2,599 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.7 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 39% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.81 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+12%)

4.80Ranks 2,209 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU22%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU3%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,253 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SPAR CAPELLA
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SPAR CAPELLA
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SPAR CAPELLA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	−3.0 kn	−14%	−34%	+184%	−72%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+2%	+11%	−16%	+180%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	+9%	+31%	−52%	+10%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−20%	−16%	+243%	−7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.4 kn	−18%	−34%	+1,102%	−61%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Spar Shipping A/S	1,813	5,695	19,336	1,863	10.4	93.8	8.81	–
2024	Spar Shipping A/S	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	1,771	5,528	21,443	2,126	10.1	82.6	6.33	94%
2022	not published	724	2,263	7,539	576	13.1	96.1	22.27	–
2021	not published	842	2,644	8,937	743	12.0	94.2	7.95	–
2020	not published	1,607	5,038	18,610	1,854	10.0	86.3	7.24	–
2019	not published	582	1,812	5,420	560	9.7	107.3	7.76	–
2018	not published	59	185	451	37	12.1	130.4	19.71	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spar Shipping A/S	8.81	7.89	+12%	2,209 of 3,610	DNV	B+C
2024	Spar Shipping A/S	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2023	not published	6.33	8.27	−23%	901 of 3,548	ABS	C
2022	not published	22.27	8.71	+156%	3,782 of 3,968	ABS	C
2021	not published	7.95	8.57	−7%	1,425 of 3,466	ABS	C
2020	not published	7.24	8.24	−12%	1,156 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	7.76	8.38	−7%	1,431 of 3,360	ABS	C
2018	not published	19.71	8.50	+132%	3,184 of 3,384	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.