Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

TRAVELING SAGE

IMO: 9491379
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 42,767 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea (from the 2022 report)
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.19 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: PANWORLD, WOOYANG ELITE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Graham Shipping Co

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,744 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

106

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.45

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (−3%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,109 t

CO₂ emitted

3,507 t

Distance sailed

10,441 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

795 h

33 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 88.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+7%)

61.0Ranks 2,282 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.7 (+0%)

8.8Faster than 50% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.52 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−17%)

4.80Ranks 1,134 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU4%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

336 t

9.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TRAVELING SAGE
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’202020’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

TRAVELING SAGE
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’202020’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TRAVELING SAGE
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−1.2 kn	−21%	−30%	+1,120%	−39%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	+6%	−4%	−88%	+27%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+6.4 kn	−34%	+30%	+2,398%	–	6.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	−5.0 kn	+64%	−7%	−98%	–	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 64%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Graham Shipping Co	1,326	4,169	14,951	1,399	10.7	88.7	6.52	–
2023	not published	138	432	1,225	103	11.9	113	10.7	–
2022	not published	1,109	3,507	10,441	795	13.1	106	8.45	–
2020	not published	67	212	418	63	6.7	161	430	–
2018	not published	1,953	6,160	19,913	1,700	11.7	98.1	8.77	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Graham Shipping Co	6.52	7.90	−17%	1,134 of 3,611	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	10.7	8.27	+29%	2,523 of 3,548	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	8.45	8.71	−3%	1,861 of 3,968	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	A
2018	not published	8.77	8.50	+3%	1,794 of 3,384	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.