Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

PATARA

IMO: 9491898
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 2,771 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Rostock
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.24 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly an alternative fuel (biofuel, methanol or similar)

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,302 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

100

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

95.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 62.4 (+53%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.7 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,970 t

CO₂ emitted

25,110 t

Distance sailed

79,478 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,803 h

242 days, 66% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 105 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+5%)

79.6Ranks 331 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 14.4 (−8%)

12.0Faster than 25% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 111 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+101%)

34.7Ranks 431 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,959 t

7.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PATARA
Vehicle carrier median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PATARA
Vehicle carrier median

12.513.013.514.014.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PATARA
Vehicle carrier median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−1%	+3%	+14%	+23%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−0%	−6%	−5%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−4%	+1%	+7%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−2%	−6%	−6%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+7%	+8%	+6%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+0%	−4%	−14%	+14%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+4%	+7%	−1%	−8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Alt. fuel	Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.	8,267	24,257	78,543	5,937	13.2	105	111	–
2024Alt. fuel	Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.	7,272	20,611	68,604	5,397	12.7	106	90.5	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,650	489	72,063	5,343	13.5	106	2.04	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7,468	80	67,653	5,237	12.9	110	0.35	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	8,044	2,278	71,834	5,286	13.6	112	10.7	–
2020	not published	7,113	22,420	67,764	5,060	13.4	105	100	–
2019	not published	8,233	25,925	78,590	5,613	14.0	105	87.8	–
2018	not published	7,970	25,110	79,478	5,803	13.7	100	95.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Alt. fuel	Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.	111	55.4	+101%	431 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024Alt. fuel	Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.	90.5	55.3	+64%	273 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2020	not published	100	57.3	+75%	381 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	87.8	59.0	+49%	337 of 426	DNV	C
2018	not published	95.7	62.4	+53%	338 of 434	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.