Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

BERNHARD SCHEPERS

IMO
9492505
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
6,119 t
Flag (estimated)
Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry
Saint-John'S
Technical efficiency
EEXI 22.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS „Konstanze“ Schiffahrtsgesellschaft UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,969 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
89.7
Container median 186 kg/nm (−52%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
35.6
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+99%)
Average speed
11.8 kn
Container median 14.1 kn (−16%)
Fuel per day at sea
25.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,299 t
CO₂ emitted
13,586 t
Distance sailed
47,945 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,078 h
170 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−54%)
78.8Ranks 265 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)
9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+158%)
7.22Ranks 1,912 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports77%
  • From the EU3%
  • Into the EU7%
  • At berth in the EU12%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,696 t
12.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BERNHARD SCHEPERS
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • BERNHARD SCHEPERS
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BERNHARD SCHEPERS
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.1 kn+1%+1%−1%+490%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024−2.3 kn+0%−17%−9%−79%2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+2.4 kn−11%+9%+29%−8%2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.6 kn+1%−4%−6%+5%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−1.2 kn+1%−9%−23%+4%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+2.4 kn+3%+25%+13%−11%2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025MS „Konstanze“ Schiffahrtsgesellschaft UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG4,24113,37152,0314,56111.481.542.0100%
2024part-yearHS Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Bernhard Schepers3,51411,10443,2323,79711.481.335.9–
2024MS „Konstanze“ Schiffahrtsgesellschaft UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG4,26813,51452,7454,65411.380.97.12–
2023not published4,68214,78857,9364,25113.680.834.3–
2022not published4,05612,83844,8564,00911.290.437.4–
2021not published4,29913,58647,9454,07811.889.735.6–
2020not published5,52117,43561,9504,76613.089.134.1–
2019not published4,74214,97054,6565,13710.686.838.5–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025MS „Konstanze“ Schiffahrtsgesellschaft UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG42.016.3+158%1,912 of 2,208RINAA
2024part-yearHS Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS Bernhard Schepers––––Swiss ClimateB
2024MS „Konstanze“ Schiffahrtsgesellschaft UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG7.1217.5−59%168 of 1,974RINAA
2023not published34.319.4+77%1,441 of 1,899DNVB
2022not published37.419.1+96%1,438 of 1,825DNVB
2021not published35.617.9+99%1,419 of 1,781DNVB
2020not published34.117.6+94%1,394 of 1,797DNVB
2019not published38.518.9+104%1,395 of 1,788Bureau VeritasB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.