Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NJ CALLISTO

IMO
9497452
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
13,421 t
Port of registry
Basseterre
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
ALMIRANTE STORNI, GMB ETERNITY, CONDOR HAMBURG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NJ TRUST MARINE LTD

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,421 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
77.1 kg/nm
Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−7%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
18.28
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+132%)
Average speed
7.6 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−29%)
Fuel per day at sea
14.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
175 t
CO₂ emitted
558 t
567 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
2,275 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
300 h
13 days, 3% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 77.1 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−7%)
61.0Ranks 1,386 of 3,610, lowest first114.1
Average speedThis ship 7.6 kn · median 10.7 (−29%)
8.8Faster than 4% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+132%)
4.80Ranks 3,328 of 3,610, lowest first15.93
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU29%
  • Into the EU36%
  • At berth in the EU35%

33% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (183 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
34.9%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • NJ CALLISTO
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • NJ CALLISTO
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • NJ CALLISTO
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−3.8 kn+5%−31%−85%+11%3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+2.0 kn+3%+24%−39%+59%2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−3.1 kn−53%−65%+567%−61%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 53%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+3.2 kn−13%+17%+152%−58%3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.5 kn+122%+133%−90%+480%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 122%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+6.7 kn−33%+177%+518%–6.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−8.9 kn+50%−71%−92%–8.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 50%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearNJ TRUST MARINE LTD922941,1441447.980.5––
2025AIO Shipmanagement Ltd1755582,2753007.677.118.28–
2024NJ TRUST MARINE LTD1,1083,50415,0381,31511.473.716.42–
2023not published1,7595,50324,4962,5969.471.810.30–
2022not published5631,7903,67529412.5153.226.19–
2021not published2588271,4591579.3176.862.50–
2020not published1,1783,73514,8141,6748.879.510.78–
2019not published2858912,3961,1182.1119.0––
2018not published2,2447,04628,2482,56911.079.410.80–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearNJ TRUST MARINE LTD––––VerifaviaA
2025AIO Shipmanagement Ltd18.287.89+132%3,328 of 3,610VerifaviaA
2024NJ TRUST MARINE LTD16.428.09+103%2,808 of 3,089VerifaviaA
2023not published10.308.27+25%2,434 of 3,548EnvServiceB
2022not published26.198.71+201%3,845 of 3,968EnvServiceB
2021not published62.508.57+629%3,466 of 3,466EnvServiceB
2020not published10.788.24+31%2,331 of 3,150EnvServiceB
2019not published––––EnvServiceB
2018not published10.808.50+27%2,453 of 3,384EnvServiceB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.