Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

TINERFE

IMO
9498107
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
5,900 t
Flag (estimated)
Portugal
Port of registry
Madeira
Technical efficiency
EIV 16.58 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,594 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
101
Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (+15%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
41.9
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (+142%)
Average speed
13.0 kn
Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+29%)
Fuel per day at sea
31.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,541 t
CO₂ emitted
11,136 t
Distance sailed
34,980 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,681 h
112 days, 31% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+5%)
52.8Ranks 831 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 11.1 (+17%)
8.8Faster than 97% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 45.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+199%)
7.93Ranks 1,353 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports64%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU36%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4,025 t
36.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • TINERFE
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • TINERFE
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • TINERFE
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.8 kn−17%−11%+14%−8%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.2 kn+2%+0%−6%+5%Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.5 kn+33%+28%−1%+34%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.3 kn−19%−17%+17%−9%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.1 kn+10%+9%−15%+9%Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.3 kn−18%−20%+14%−16%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.0 kn+10%+10%−9%+716%Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.3,52011,17742,0823,23713.083.645.0–
2024Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.3,70811,69736,9893,03212.210049.1–
2023not published3,88512,26839,4643,19112.498.446.7–
2022not published2,9509,45639,9063,10512.973.934.7–
2021not published3,1249,99534,0612,71212.691.738.2–
2020not published3,32810,52639,9503,14012.783.335.0–
2019not published3,54111,13634,9802,68113.010141.9–
2018not published3,52411,08238,3632,95213.091.95.146%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.45.015.0+199%1,353 of 1,460Lloyd's RegisterB
2024Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.49.116.7+193%1,190 of 1,274Lloyd's RegisterB
2023not published46.716.2+188%1,212 of 1,314Lloyd's RegisterA+C
2022not published34.716.1+116%1,205 of 1,409Korean RegisterA+C
2021not published38.216.7+129%1,176 of 1,343Korean RegisterA+C
2020not published35.016.2+117%1,115 of 1,312Korean RegisterA+C
2019not published41.917.3+142%1,182 of 1,321Korean RegisterA+C
2018not published5.1417.1−70%6 of 1,294Korean RegisterC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.