Navalyze · Other · Ship

ANNA

IMO: 9501887
Type: Other ship types
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EIV 23.77 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

83.8

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+52%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

36.0

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+47%)

Average speed

13.9 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+30%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,092 t

CO₂ emitted

12,800 t

Distance sailed

48,834 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,525 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.7 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+11%)

42.2Ranks 116 of 189, lowest first142

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 11.1 (+19%)

8.5Faster than 79% of other ships14.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 157 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.6 (+204%)

21.3Ranks 148 of 189, lowest first306

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU39%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

639 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANNA
Other median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANNA
Other median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ANNA
Other median

0.050.0100150200250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+8%	+9%	−6%	–	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−9%	−8%	+184%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−3%	−8%	−70%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+5%	+11%	−9%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+3%	−2%	−25%	−7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	+8%	+34%	+160%	−16%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−8%	−10%	−30%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	2,330	7,384	26,845	1,995	13.5	86.8	–	–
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “ANNA”	2,315	7,264	28,668	2,166	13.2	80.7	157	–
2023	not published	891	2,809	10,107	766	13.2	88.2	204	–
2022	not published	3,062	9,689	33,640	2,421	13.9	91.0	232	–
2021	not published	3,179	9,974	36,780	2,800	13.1	86.5	–	–
2020	not published	4,092	12,800	48,834	3,525	13.9	83.8	–	–
2019	not published	1,454	4,562	18,784	1,678	11.2	77.4	–	–
2018	not published	2,262	7,093	26,789	2,361	11.3	84.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+B+C
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “ANNA”	157	51.6	+204%	148 of 189	EnvService	C
2023	not published	204	93.5	+119%	90 of 116	Swiss Climate	C
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	33.7	22.7	+48%	936 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	36.0	24.5	+47%	930 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	43.0	25.0	+72%	958 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	33.9	24.9	+36%	748 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.