Navalyze · Container · Ship

PHOENIX J

IMO: 9504047
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,756 t
Port of registry: Saint-John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,756 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

78.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.75

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+125%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,623 t

CO₂ emitted

11,429 t

11,607 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

46,032 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,977 h

166 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 78.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−56%)

78.8Ranks 221 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+125%)

7.22Ranks 1,819 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports80%
From the EU9%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU3%

90% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,266 t).

Fuel burned laden

100%

0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PHOENIX J
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PHOENIX J
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PHOENIX J
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−4%	−1%	−9%	−21%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−0%	−14%	−5%	+5%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−1%	−6%	+41%	−10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	−4%	+8%	−14%	+9%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−6%	+6%	−18%	+1%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−8%	−16%	−18%	+3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−2%	−5%	+51%	+3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	3,623	11,429	46,032	3,977	11.6	78.7	36.75	100%
2024	MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	4,149	13,187	50,398	4,502	11.2	82.3	46.56	–
2023	not published	4,357	13,863	52,871	4,073	13.0	82.4	44.17	–
2022	not published	3,126	9,960	37,426	2,763	13.5	83.5	49.18	–
2021	not published	3,793	12,108	43,612	3,597	12.1	87.0	45.17	–
2020	not published	4,892	15,594	52,985	4,926	10.8	92.3	44.75	–
2019	not published	6,504	20,624	64,556	5,483	11.8	100.8	43.33	–
2018	not published	4,375	13,884	42,641	3,496	12.2	102.6	42.16	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	36.75	16.30	+125%	1,819 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	46.56	17.52	+166%	1,711 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	44.17	19.40	+128%	1,603 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	49.18	19.13	+157%	1,597 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	45.17	17.90	+152%	1,541 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	44.75	17.58	+155%	1,542 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	43.33	18.88	+130%	1,472 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	42.16	20.22	+109%	1,381 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.