Navalyze · Container · Ship

PHOENIX J

IMO: 9504047
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,756 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint-John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,373 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

101

Container median 174 kg/nm (−42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

43.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+130%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,504 t

CO₂ emitted

20,624 t

Distance sailed

64,556 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,483 h

228 days, 63% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 78.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−56%)

78.8Ranks 221 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+125%)

7.22Ranks 1,819 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

986 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PHOENIX J
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PHOENIX J
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PHOENIX J
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−4%	−1%	−9%	−21%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−0%	−14%	−5%	+5%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−1%	−6%	+41%	−10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	−4%	+8%	−14%	+9%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−6%	+6%	−18%	+1%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−8%	−16%	−18%	+3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−2%	−5%	+51%	+3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	3,623	11,429	46,032	3,977	11.6	78.7	36.8	100%
2024	MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	4,149	13,187	50,398	4,502	11.2	82.3	46.6	–
2023	not published	4,357	13,863	52,871	4,073	13.0	82.4	44.2	–
2022	not published	3,126	9,960	37,426	2,763	13.5	83.5	49.2	–
2021	not published	3,793	12,108	43,612	3,597	12.1	87.0	45.2	–
2020	not published	4,892	15,594	52,985	4,926	10.8	92.3	44.8	–
2019	not published	6,504	20,624	64,556	5,483	11.8	101	43.3	–
2018	not published	4,375	13,884	42,641	3,496	12.2	103	42.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	36.8	16.3	+125%	1,819 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	MS "PHOENIX J" New Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	46.6	17.5	+166%	1,711 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	44.2	19.4	+128%	1,603 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	49.2	19.1	+157%	1,597 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	45.2	17.9	+152%	1,541 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	44.8	17.6	+155%	1,542 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	43.3	18.9	+130%	1,472 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	42.2	20.2	+109%	1,381 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.