Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

HAIGUI

IMO: 9505821
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 59,369 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: GULF VALOUR, SLOANE SQUARE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eletson Shipmanagement Inc.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,369 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

138.0 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.27

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−9%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,826 t

CO₂ emitted

11,965 t

12,152 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

27,721 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,652 h

111 days, 30% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 138.0 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+7%)

76.1Ranks 1,007 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 10.7 (−2%)

8.0Faster than 42% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.27 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−9%)

4.51Ranks 699 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU31%
Into the EU63%
At berth in the EU6%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,359 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HAIGUI
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HAIGUI
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HAIGUI
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−8%	−18%	−37%	+23%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+6%	+31%	+117%	−0%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	+3.2 kn	−16%	+28%	+334%	−91%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.1 kn	−6%	−38%	−82%	+5,171%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.9 kn	+18%	−10%	−27%	−14%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+2%	−0%	+11%	−80%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Eletson Shipmanagement Inc.	3,826	11,965	27,721	2,652	10.5	138.0	7.27	–
2024	Eletson Shipmanagement Inc.	6,640	20,783	44,330	3,791	11.7	149.8	5.89	–
2023	not published	2,902	9,070	20,444	2,169	9.4	141.9	5.91	–
2021	not published	794	2,508	4,706	763	6.2	168.8	63.25	–
2020	not published	4,593	14,517	25,578	2,746	9.3	179.6	1.20	–
2019	not published	5,330	16,685	35,168	2,874	12.2	151.6	1.40	–
2018	not published	4,737	14,853	31,814	2,545	12.5	148.9	6.83	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eletson Shipmanagement Inc.	7.27	7.95	−9%	699 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	Eletson Shipmanagement Inc.	5.89	8.06	−27%	454 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	5.91	8.44	−30%	408 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	63.25	8.86	+614%	1,760 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	1.20	9.03	−87%	21 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	1.40	8.83	−84%	33 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	6.83	8.86	−23%	550 of 1,779	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.