Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

BWEK TENERIFE

IMO: 9506198
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,310 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ESHIPS SHAMAL, TRISTAR SHAMAL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ESHIPS LPG 2 LIMITED

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,619 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

59.6

Gas carrier (LPG) median 84.4 kg/nm (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

118

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 46.9 (+152%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 13.1 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,652 t

CO₂ emitted

5,297 t

Distance sailed

27,729 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,987 h

83 days, 23% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.5 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−21%)

49.8Ranks 74 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 12.6 (−21%)

8.8Faster than 16% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 158 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+344%)

14.4Ranks 335 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU24%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU29%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,560 t

29.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BWEK TENERIFE
Gas carrier (LPG) median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BWEK TENERIFE
Gas carrier (LPG) median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BWEK TENERIFE
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.8 kn	+3%	−13%	−17%	+42%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−6%	−14%	+7%	−24%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−8%	−13%	+18%	+3%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+22%	+19%	−21%	+21%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−12%	−12%	−16%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−13%	−3%	+13%	−0%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+6.0 kn	−5%	+82%	+9%	−16%	6.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	ESHIPS LPG 2 LIMITED	917	2,940	13,441	1,074	12.5	68.2	153	–
2025	BW Epic Kosan Maritime Pte. Ltd.	1,471	4,715	22,816	2,271	10.0	64.5	158	–
2024	ESHIPS LPG 2 LIMITED	1,736	5,565	27,586	2,337	11.8	62.9	111	–
2023	not published	1,730	5,547	25,847	2,017	12.8	66.9	147	–
2022	not published	1,593	5,106	21,894	1,613	13.6	72.7	143	–
2021	not published	1,652	5,297	27,729	1,987	14.0	59.6	118	–
2020	not published	2,251	7,216	33,205	2,380	14.0	67.8	126	–
2019	not published	2,276	7,289	29,303	2,342	12.5	77.7	127	–
2018	not published	2,200	7,027	26,998	4,134	6.5	81.5	152	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	ESHIPS LPG 2 LIMITED	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2025	BW Epic Kosan Maritime Pte. Ltd.	158	35.6	+344%	335 of 355	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2024	ESHIPS LPG 2 LIMITED	111	35.8	+210%	268 of 306	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	147	41.8	+251%	308 of 330	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	143	42.5	+237%	332 of 348	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	118	46.9	+152%	287 of 323	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	126	42.3	+199%	299 of 339	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	127	45.9	+177%	294 of 331	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	152	53.1	+185%	275 of 297	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.