Navalyze · Container · Ship

RAQUEL S

IMO: 9515591
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,745 t
Port of registry: Portugal
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.75 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,745 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

98.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

31.46

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+93%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,484 t

CO₂ emitted

20,245 t

20,564 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

66,039 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,017 h

209 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 98.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−45%)

78.8Ranks 512 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.3 (−1%)

9.1Faster than 47% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 31.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+93%)

7.22Ranks 1,720 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports34%
From the EU20%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU6%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,201 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

RAQUEL S
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RAQUEL S
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RAQUEL S
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+8%	+8%	+10%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−4%	−3%	−9%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+11%	+11%	+22%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−3%	+3%	+21%	−12%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+2%	+6%	+19%	+28%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−7%	−13%	−8%	−15%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	−5%	+5%	+7%	−20%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA	6,484	20,245	66,039	5,017	13.2	98.2	31.46	–
2024	GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA	5,446	17,008	60,070	4,568	13.2	90.7	30.23	–
2023	not published	6,241	19,484	65,958	5,099	12.9	94.6	33.65	–
2022	not published	4,628	14,457	54,224	4,194	12.9	85.3	26.42	–
2021	not published	3,928	12,260	44,810	3,647	12.3	87.7	29.98	–
2020	not published	3,232	10,101	37,757	3,180	11.9	85.6	23.40	–
2019	not published	3,764	11,757	40,999	3,204	12.8	91.8	27.42	–
2018	not published	3,667	11,458	38,144	3,280	11.6	96.2	34.12	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA	31.46	16.30	+93%	1,720 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA	30.23	17.52	+73%	1,463 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	33.65	19.40	+73%	1,426 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	26.42	19.13	+38%	1,195 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	29.98	17.90	+67%	1,300 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	23.40	17.58	+33%	1,164 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	27.42	18.88	+45%	1,184 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	34.12	20.22	+69%	1,241 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.