Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PERISTIL

IMO: 9519626
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,501 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.33 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jadroplov dd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,501 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

221.3 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+168%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

108

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+1,274%)

Average speed

8.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

324 t

CO₂ emitted

1,031 t

1,047 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

1,463 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

177 h

7 days, 2% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 221.3 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+168%)

61.0Ranks 3,599 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 10.7 (−22%)

8.8Faster than 7% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 108.42 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+1,274%)

4.80Ranks 3,570 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU46%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU47%

74% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (764 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

46.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PERISTIL
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PERISTIL
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PERISTIL
Bulk carrier median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	−4%	+33%	−50%	+126%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−5.1 kn	+90%	+3%	−51%	+372%	5.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 90%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	−1.3 kn	+40%	+25%	−24%	−9%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	−48%	−37%	+43%	−40%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 48%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+77%	+91%	−77%	+163%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 77%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+1%	−5%	+64%	+7%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Jadroplov dd	324	1,031	1,463	177	8.3	221.3	108.42	–
2024	Jadroplov dd	676	2,121	2,935	488	6.0	230.4	47.96	–
2023	not published	728	2,270	5,996	542	11.1	121.5	10.17	–
2021	not published	686	2,162	7,926	638	12.4	86.5	11.14	–
2020	not published	924	2,942	5,536	543	10.2	166.9	18.53	–
2019	not published	2,302	7,214	24,359	2,584	9.4	94.5	7.04	–
2018	not published	1,380	4,316	14,811	1,473	10.1	93.2	6.60	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Jadroplov dd	108.42	7.89	+1,274%	3,570 of 3,610	Bureau Veritas	B
2024	Jadroplov dd	47.96	8.09	+493%	3,070 of 3,089	Bureau Veritas	B
2023	not published	10.17	8.27	+23%	2,409 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	B
2021	not published	11.14	8.57	+30%	2,572 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	18.53	8.24	+125%	2,983 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	7.04	8.38	−16%	1,119 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	6.60	8.50	−22%	876 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.