Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PERISTIL

IMO: 9519626
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,501 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.33 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jadroplov dd

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,065 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

94.5

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (−16%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,302 t

CO₂ emitted

7,214 t

Distance sailed

24,359 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,584 h

108 days, 29% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 221 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+168%)

61.0Ranks 3,600 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 10.7 (−22%)

8.8Faster than 7% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 108 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+1,272%)

4.80Ranks 3,571 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU14%
Into the EU80%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

338 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PERISTIL
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PERISTIL
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PERISTIL
Bulk carrier median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	−4%	+33%	−50%	+126%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−5.1 kn	+90%	+3%	−51%	+372%	5.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 90%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	−1.3 kn	+40%	+25%	−24%	−9%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	−48%	−37%	+43%	−40%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 48%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+77%	+91%	−77%	+163%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 77%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+1%	−5%	+64%	+7%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Jadroplov dd	324	1,031	1,463	177	8.3	221	108	–
2024	Jadroplov dd	676	2,121	2,935	488	6.0	230	48.0	–
2023	not published	728	2,270	5,996	542	11.1	122	10.2	–
2021	not published	686	2,162	7,926	638	12.4	86.5	11.1	–
2020	not published	924	2,942	5,536	543	10.2	167	18.5	–
2019	not published	2,302	7,214	24,359	2,584	9.4	94.5	7.04	–
2018	not published	1,380	4,316	14,811	1,473	10.1	93.2	6.60	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Jadroplov dd	108	7.90	+1,272%	3,571 of 3,611	Bureau Veritas	B
2024	Jadroplov dd	48.0	8.09	+493%	3,070 of 3,089	Bureau Veritas	B
2023	not published	10.2	8.27	+23%	2,409 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	B
2021	not published	11.1	8.57	+30%	2,572 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	18.5	8.24	+125%	2,983 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	7.04	8.38	−16%	1,119 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	6.60	8.50	−22%	876 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.