Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

NAVIN HAWK

IMO: 9522738
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.17 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

28.1 kg/nm

General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

18.25

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.25 (−5%)

Average speed

7.5 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (−29%)

Fuel per day at sea

5.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

839 t

CO₂ emitted

2,638 t

2,679 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

29,846 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,982 h

166 days, 45% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 28.1 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−52%)

34.9Ranks 31 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 10.5 (−29%)

7.8Faster than 9% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.25 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (−5%)

7.51Ranks 507 of 1,111, lowest first39.26

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU33%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU4%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,598 t).

Fuel burned laden

77%

23% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NAVIN HAWK
General cargo median

20.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

NAVIN HAWK
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

NAVIN HAWK
General cargo median

18.020.022.024.026.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	−13%	−25%	+74%	−10%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−5%	−14%	+7%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.6 kn	+11%	+49%	−22%	+20%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.5 kn	−9%	−33%	−30%	−19%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.1 kn	+5%	+55%	−12%	−10%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+9%	−4%	+18%	+35%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.	1,024	3,260	31,774	3,692	8.6	32.2	–	–
2024	Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.	839	2,638	29,846	3,982	7.5	28.1	–	77%
2023	not published	551	1,730	17,112	1,950	8.8	32.2	–	–
2022	not published	542	1,720	16,005	1,638	9.8	33.8	–	–
2021	not published	628	1,995	20,562	2,841	7.2	30.5	–	–
2020	not published	993	3,155	29,513	3,035	9.7	33.6	–	77%
2019	not published	1,071	3,366	33,551	5,061	6.6	31.9	–	67%
2018	not published	828	2,598	28,405	3,720	7.6	29.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	B
2024	Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.	18.25	19.25	−5%	507 of 1,111	RINA	B
2023	not published	20.36	20.67	−1%	508 of 1,045	RINA	B
2022	not published	22.02	21.57	+2%	537 of 1,034	RINA	B
2021	not published	18.39	22.70	−19%	363 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	22.75	24.50	−7%	503 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	25.19	24.96	+1%	584 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	18.64	24.89	−25%	289 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.