Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ITHAKI

IMO: 9526461
Type: Oil tanker
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

217.3 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

13.2 kn

Fuel per day at sea

68.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

960 t

CO₂ emitted

2,990 t

3,037 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,418 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

335 h

14 days, 4% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 297.6 kg/nm · median 129.0 (+131%)

79.5Ranks 1,773 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.9 (+0%)

8.1Faster than 50% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.25 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+64%)

4.44Ranks 1,372 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU100%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,495 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ITHAKI
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ITHAKI
Oil tanker median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	−27%	−12%	+105%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	960	2,990	4,418	335	13.2	217.3	–	–
2024	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	642	2,020	2,156	198	10.9	297.6	13.25	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2024	DYNACOM TANKERS MANAGEMENT LTD	13.25	8.06	+64%	1,372 of 1,787	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.