Navalyze · Container · Ship

HENRIKA SCHULTE

IMO: 9535163
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 35,514 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL GLIDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Heliconia Shipping limited

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,514 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

179.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.86

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−3%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

68.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,640 t

CO₂ emitted

42,748 t

43,418 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

75,896 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,787 h

199 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 179.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+2%)

78.8Ranks 1,124 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 88% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.86 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−3%)

7.22Ranks 1,078 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU54%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU1%

11% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,616 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HENRIKA SCHULTE
Container median

160.0170.0180.0190.0200.0210.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HENRIKA SCHULTE
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HENRIKA SCHULTE
Container median

12.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+8%	+13%	+41%	+4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−7%	−8%	−36%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−9%	+1%	+179%	+21%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+1%	−3%	−26%	−42%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+11%	+12%	−52%	+55%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−6%	−9%	−7%	−14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−8%	−12%	+0%	−16%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Heliconia Shipping limited	10,917	34,206	61,951	3,969	15.6	176.2	15.31	–
2025	AIDA PARK SHIPPING PTE .LTD	13,640	42,748	75,896	4,787	15.9	179.7	15.86	–
2024	Heliconia Shipping limited	8,894	27,938	53,653	3,538	15.2	165.8	15.23	–
2023	not published	14,858	46,585	83,598	5,461	15.3	177.7	15.44	–
2022	not published	5,874	18,523	30,007	2,171	13.8	195.8	12.72	–
2021	not published	7,908	25,001	40,592	2,824	14.4	194.8	22.08	–
2020	not published	14,739	46,260	84,199	5,917	14.2	175.1	14.29	–
2019	not published	16,810	52,653	90,484	6,141	14.7	185.8	16.63	–
2018	not published	18,180	57,016	90,214	5,863	15.4	201.5	19.90	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Heliconia Shipping limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	AIDA PARK SHIPPING PTE .LTD	15.86	16.30	−3%	1,078 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Heliconia Shipping limited	15.23	17.52	−13%	831 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	15.44	19.40	−20%	756 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	12.72	19.13	−34%	529 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	22.08	17.90	+23%	1,081 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	14.29	17.58	−19%	690 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	16.63	18.88	−12%	758 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	19.90	20.22	−2%	832 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.