Navalyze · Container · Ship

HENRIKA SCHULTE

IMO: 9535163
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 35,514 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL GLIDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Heliconia Shipping limited

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 31,759 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

202

Container median 182 kg/nm (+11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−2%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

74.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,180 t

CO₂ emitted

57,016 t

Distance sailed

90,214 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,863 h

244 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 180 kg/nm · median 177 (+2%)

78.8Ranks 1,124 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 88% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−3%)

7.22Ranks 1,078 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU51%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

667 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HENRIKA SCHULTE
Container median

160.0170.0180.0190.0200.0210.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HENRIKA SCHULTE
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HENRIKA SCHULTE
Container median

12.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+8%	+13%	+41%	+4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−7%	−8%	−36%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−9%	+1%	+179%	+21%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+1%	−3%	−26%	−42%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+11%	+12%	−52%	+55%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−6%	−9%	−7%	−14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−8%	−12%	+0%	−16%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Heliconia Shipping limited	10,917	34,206	61,951	3,969	15.6	176	15.3	–
2025	AIDA PARK SHIPPING PTE .LTD	13,640	42,748	75,896	4,787	15.9	180	15.9	–
2024	Heliconia Shipping limited	8,894	27,938	53,653	3,538	15.2	166	15.2	–
2023	not published	14,858	46,585	83,598	5,461	15.3	178	15.4	–
2022	not published	5,874	18,523	30,007	2,171	13.8	196	12.7	–
2021	not published	7,908	25,001	40,592	2,824	14.4	195	22.1	–
2020	not published	14,739	46,260	84,199	5,917	14.2	175	14.3	–
2019	not published	16,810	52,653	90,484	6,141	14.7	186	16.6	–
2018	not published	18,180	57,016	90,214	5,863	15.4	202	19.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Heliconia Shipping limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	AIDA PARK SHIPPING PTE .LTD	15.9	16.3	−3%	1,078 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Heliconia Shipping limited	15.2	17.5	−13%	831 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	15.4	19.4	−20%	756 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	12.7	19.1	−34%	529 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	22.1	17.9	+23%	1,081 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	14.3	17.6	−19%	690 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	16.6	18.9	−12%	758 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	19.9	20.2	−2%	832 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.